Isn't that the fundamental concern here. It is all relative to perspective... Good (or bad or Evil or whatever) are dependent on your point of view. Just think of election results.
A really clever site would ask you for your point of view (or remember when you disagree) and adjust accordingly. A complex task though... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Northrop Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [backstage] Mood News 3 Davy Mitchell wrote: > As MN is getting a fair number of hits for its early stage in > development, I have posted an update as it has moved on greatly. It's > using much the same rating system. I've spent the time on reorganising > the code, some DBase work, presentation and the client side stuff. It's an excellent concept, and very clever, however there are a few odd things there. For example, "City agree Wright-Phillips fee". Now this is good news for Mr Wright-Phillips, and for Chelsea, but not good news for Manchester City. Therefore it should either be neutral, or does the system work on utilitarianism? Not a criticism, just more something that there may be a way of working round in the future. Although there probably isn't... -- From the North, this is Kirk www.broadcastingsights.org.uk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
