Betsie is a bull in a sledgehammer/nut approach to accessibility from a
time when that was the only way to crack the nut.  Now, someone has
invented the nutcracker.

Of course not everyone yet has a nutcracker so we still need the
sledgehammer, but it's role is increasing.

What Betsie does - specifically its rearranging of navigation to be at
the bottom - was necessary for the time, but that rearrangement can be
done within the HTML very easily (that's how I build my own webpages -
so when you turn off CSS, content at the top, navigation at the bottom).

Conversion of colours etc, is even easier with CSS.  These things can be
automatically built into a page without needing standalone parsers.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
> Sent: 09 November 2005 09:20
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [backstage] iMP: accessibility, is the smell 
> really that bad?
> 
> 
> Betsie was for an age when only one version of a site was usually 
> produced.  The advent of CSS and more importantly I think, 
> XSLT and XML 
> means it's much easier and cleaner to produce XML datasets of 
> websites 
> and parse the contents through XSLT to produce differing 
> compliant outputs..
> 
> Gordon Joly wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Betsie's days are no doubt numbered - modern coding 
> techniques allow 
> >> much greater accessibility to be built into webpages, allowing 
> >> accessibility without having to resort to parsers like 
> Betsie.  You 
> >> can do a huge amount with a sensible HTML structure and CSS 
> >> layout/presenation techniques.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I assume that y'all have read the code (of BETSIE)?
> >
> > Gordo
> >
> 
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
> unsubscribe, please visit 
> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to