> I suspect at many points in the show, he's has on two different tracks, plus his own drum machine.

Well, that at least goes some way to explaining why I find it an intolerable racket ;-)

More seriously on this point, I think on this list there are a collection of people who are likely to be more tolerant of the 80/20 rule than the general public. You would be astonished at the number of phone calls, yes *phone calls*, that the BBC gets to complain about typographical errors on news.bbc.co.uk or spelling mistakes on News 24 captions or about pages failing to update on Ceefax. Dan is right to be wary.

m




James Mastros wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0100, Richard P Edwards wrote:
   Hi,
   I would like to add to this.
   If you look on the Pete Tong Radio 1 web-site, for example, you will see
   that a playlist is published as much as possible.
Note, by the way, that the Pete Tong show (if it's the one I'm thinking of;
I've only caught the beginning of it once -- not my cup of tea) contains
just about every possible special case.  It contains music mixed from the
source well in advance, it contains a live show, it probably contains single
performances split into multiple 2 hour chuncks.  It's likely nearly
impossible for even the majority of the transcript to be up live, and I
suspect at many points in the show, he's has on two different tracks, plus
his own drum machine.

   Two points come to mind...
   1. If the shows are specialist then it is very important that the audience
   has this information.
   2. In which ever case, for the sake of the music business and new artists,
   there should never be a situation where this information is not documented
   for MCPS/PRS etc......
I assume what you mean is "so that the artists get paid".  There's a limit
to that, though.  Artists don't need to get paid for several weeks (possibly
several months).  They don't get paid for a few seconds of the song.  In
fact, I'm surprised they get paid directly by the BBC at all -- in the US,
the recording industry gives away tracks, including the right to play them
on air -- to the radio.  They consider it great advertising.  OTOH, around
here there's a lot more TV advertising for music.  (Not on the BBC,
obviously.)

   Therefore 80% actually online now, is far better than the odd piece
   missed, for everyone concerned. Anyway - what do those show producers do
   whilst on air?
Um, produce the show?  It takes a lot of effort to make this sort of thing
look effortless.  Who do you think listens to everybody calling the Jo
Whiley show?  (Which reminds me of another fun special case -- every morning
on her show at approx 10:30, she has a segment during which the entire point is that the audience doesn't know what tracks are being played in real-time, the 7 song shuffle.)

    -=- James Mastros
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to