On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I deleted it to write the other. Basically my position is "I make
the software, therefore I make the rules".

Since we want to live in a good society, we find behaviors of
individuals that are harmful to everyone else, and make them not-cool,
or even illegal.

Consider the phrase "I make the car, therefore I make the rules about
how fast I drive it." or even "I make the crack, therefore I make the
rules."

At the end of the day, software is a product

I've just written about this in reply to someone else - I hope you can
reply to those comments in regards to this.

Mandating that software should
be free is a naieve position that doesn't take a number of factors into
account. From what I read of your initial email for example, you can
charge for your software but then the person who buys it has the right
to redistribute it. And how does original creator get compensated fairly
based on the actual number of people using the product?

"Compensation" implies repaying some kind of damages. I don't
understand what the damages are - perhaps you can explain them? :-)
I'm also not sure why the number of people using a program is
relevant.

I think the real issue is how can programmers gain an income from their work.

The majority of software written is not available to the public, but
it used privately. Most programmers earn plenty of income this way,
independently on a freelance basis or on a salary from a large
corporation.

When software is available to the public, the public's rights trump
the whims of developers. If this is still unclear, please read
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html

Business models
built on "Faith in human nature" tend to be... Y'know... Non-existant.

My faith in business models that sue their customers is non-existent :-)

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to