Okay, that sounds great, but what about rights management?  I know its going
to happen anyway but

On 21/12/06, Richard P Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What is great is that.....

One 3.5m satellite dish with a four way LNB, connected to four Sky
boxes with four Sling Media Sling boxes attached to four Macs,
because that is what I like, each with a couple of "realtime"
Automator actions, stream the whole lot to Democracy from behind
Psiphon. Perhaps £10K for the lot. I believe that it will happen by
the end of February, BBC1-4 live'ish on the net.

Before I get raided, I will not be doing this, but any guesses on how
long until someone does?....  it really is that easy. Perhaps the one
feed that you are all missing is the realtime TV feed that is
available to us all. I would call it "BC plus" - plus the hour it
takes to digitise,verify and stream. Add more dishes and more
torrents, and you end up with the same legal situation as the music
industry has..... for good or bad.

For £166 million the BBC, as the "original BBC" could do it, might
upset the Aussies though.... but hey, they have the Ashes back :-)
Better still, everyone who is interested in the UK could be asked to
contribute (BBC Associate program) and the BBC could sell the idea to
the Rights holders by splitting any revenue with them based on the
number of times a show is viewed at the end of the year..... similar
to the commercial radio model. The BBC could then use a "click" count
similar to Google ads..... but only if they manage a system whereby
they are in some control of the first release..... and scan any sites
that use the content for numbers of hits. Financially, if done
legally, which I believe the majority would, I can see everyone
making more money than they do now...... I believe the Music model
has shown that the quality is important, so more DVD's could be sold,
and the BBC would have more information about what to re-run on TV
based on the figures from the net.

I don't believe I am a geek with computers..... so please don't be
upset at the above idea, it is for research and information only..
and it would work:-)

Regards
Rich E

On 20 Dec 2006, at 20:44, Nic James Ferrier wrote:

> "Ian Forrester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Nic what kind of stuff are talking about doing? Which Lawyers are
>> you worried about? BBC or others? Can you give me an idea.
>
> Sure. One thing I'd like to do would be to:
>
> - take the BBC realvideo feeds (say newsnight)
> - convert them into something sensible (mpeg?)
> - make them into an atom feed
> - shove them on democracy
> - see them when I want, not when the BBC says I can
>
> or:
>
> - the above
> - shove them into some website
> - let people tag them and cross reference them
> - let people search that
> - let people cross reference that, say BBC news programmes with other
>   news programmes like democracy-now
>
>
> I can't do those things coz I'm pretty sure they're against the
> law. As soon as I started converting BBC content into something else
> so that it would play nicely on the Net the BBC's lawyers would be
> talking to me. I'm pretty sure that would happen.
>
> If you're saying that wouldn't happen that's great!
>
> --
> Nic Ferrier
> http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
> please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
> mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/[email protected]/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/




--
This email is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
Its contents are confidential and may only be retained by the named
recipient(s) and may only be copied or disclosed with the prior consent of
Timothy-John Bishop. If you are not the intended recipient please discard
this email and notify the sender as quickly as possible. This email and any
attached files have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.
Please note that electronic mail may be monitored in accordance with the
Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practices) (Interception of
Communications) Regulations 2000.

Reply via email to