Hi all,

I have been watching this debate with great interest....
As a recording engineer/producer of 20 years, I have many examples of the different views expressed here. I also have digital content waiting to be released on the unsuspecting public sometime in the future, or when I can find a manner to secure the rights for the artists involved. As ever, that is truly complicated. Technically speaking, I wonder whether others have thought about self destructive files? If a producer is willing to give away his work completely for free for example, thereby losing his/her rights of distribution through the internet, could one of the best "DRM" type features be that the file itself will disappear from the users desktop/hard-drive at some pre-programmed date? I know this is similar to the BBC's 7 day restriction, but if the file actually deleted itself then the "value" would appear in people returning to the same web-site to download new copies, without restrictions of where they could be played. In this case the user/ customer would actually be engaged without having to make any effort to sort their own digital data, which may lead to far less copying. Obviously people could still make their own physical copies, but I think most would agree that the vast majority would not, ie... how many here know of anyone that makes DVD's of You-tube content?


I will be very interested if such a management system already exists.
All the best
RichE



On 1 Feb 2007, at 09:19, Andrew Bowden wrote:

And I'm sure the proposal for "Linux DRM" will go down well in the
FLOSS
community, as well as a lead balloon anyway. I can see the slashdot
headline already: "BBC proposing DRM for Linux"

Well there are pretty obvious divisions in the community.  A lot of
people have recently gone on the record as saying that the platform
needs DRM to survive, others are vehamontly opposed to it on idiological
groups.  Linus has of course, said his thing.

However as no one is really producing DRM'd content on a large scale
(that I'm aware of) it's very hard to know what the balance of views is. It's actually going to need someone to start doing it, before we see how the community reacts in practise. Seeing it in use will be, IMHO, a far
more interesting test!
        


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/[email protected]/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to