On 25/06/07, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 25 June 2007 12:14, Tom Loosemore wrote: > On 22/06/07, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 22 June 2007 15:21, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > Possibly everyone has decided to heed the suggestion that this topic > > > is best dealt with elsewhere, leaving this list for its intended use. > > > > Without reading the text of the complaint, OFCOM is definitely a better > > place to complain that this mailing list, IMO > > OFCOM has no regulatory power over the BBC other than certain kinds of > taste and decency of non-internet broadcasting. > > The BBC Trust is the BBC's regulator. > > Complain to them if you wish. But do so with patient logic and evidence.I didn't read the text, but I did read the very beginning: "I am writing to invite you to address what appears to be, on the face of it, an incomplete Market Impact Assessment (MIA) by Ofcom " The letter relates to an OFCOM document. Complaining to OFCOM about one of their documents - as that letter does - strikes me as a much more sensible place to complain about it, than this mailing list. YMMV, :-)
That's very true... - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
