Certainly.

>From my occasional online journal...

 He's arguing that the BBC's use of DRM in its new iPlayer service
will legitimise the spread of DRM - at least I think that's what he's
thinks he's arguing. Actually, it's a reason-free rant against DRM
from the "Everything should be free and fluffy - we're great, big
business evil, woo - MEMEME! I WANT it for nothing NOW!" brigade.


Mr Doctorow conveniently ignores the fact that the programme rights
owners collectively insisted that the BBC implemented DRM in iPlayer,
ignores the fact that the iPlayer doesn't actually stop you using the
VCR that you've relied on for years to record programmes you want to
keep, describes the iPlayer service as 'Ostensibly... a "seven-day
catch-up service"' - implying that it's actually something different -
but then doesn't tell us what he thinks it is, and claims (with no
evidence or justification) that the BBC will be to blame if all video
in future comes with DRM.


The iPlayer isn't perfect, it's still in Beta, and yes, it *is* a
seven day catch-up service, as is 4OD. I missed the Dawkins programme
on Monday night and really wanted to see it - but had no desire to
keep it for posterity. So I downloaded it from Channel 4 in about an
hour (it would have taken *hours* if I'd got a Bit Torrent version)
and watched it over lunch. Job done.


The fact that iPlayer doesn't work on (Doctorow's figure) 25% of
computer users' computers is irrelevent. You can't use it at all if
you haven't got a computer, it won't run on your fridge - and as
pointed out earlier, it's in Public Beta. It's planned to release
versions for other OSs ASAP.


It's not the great evil a lot of people have suggested - it's a
flawed, but in Beta, additional way of watching time shifted TV which
can be used by the vast majority of computer-using license payers -
and that percentage will quickly increase . It doesn't pretend to
replace anything - you can still watch and record DRM free programmes
from the BBC.

Cheers,

Rich.

On 8/15/07, Tim Cowlishaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes.  Utter, utter rubbish, that whole piece.
>
> Would you care to give us a slightly more reasoned critique, Richard?
> despite Cory's apparent predeliction for Soviet-Union-based metaphors (check
> out his other DRM article for the Guardian), i thought he made his argument
> very well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
>
>


-- 
SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073

Registered address:
4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to