On 10/10/2007, Duncan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2007, Martin Deutsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Switching between SDI signals is easy; what Duncan's suggesting is a bit
> > trickier.
> > At present: the BBC and ITV, and Channel 4 have satellite multiplexes
> which
> > carry several channels which are the same for most of the day; they can
> > differ when it comes to news, regional programmes and advertising.
> Ideally,
> > each mux could carry a high bitrate version of (eg) ITV1 during network
> > programming, but during regional opts (local news, ad breaks, etc),
> would
> > carry each of the local streams, though probably at a lower bitrate, and
> the
> > viewer wouldn't notice a thing.
> > I *think* that DVB can do this, but changing the SI tables (which tell
> the
> > receiver where to find the video and audio associated with a network) on
> the
> > fly isn't an exact enough science to be able to do it with the frame
> > accuracy desired by the broadcasters
> >
> > I suspect someone - BBC R&D? - has already done research into this.
> >
> >  - martin
> >
>
> Yes that is what I was getting onto, wasn't sure about going into
> broadcast acronyms too much was half my issue before. If it were
> possible then it would free up an awful lot of bandwidth for a higher
> quality ITV1 (for example) during non-regional times, I'd love it to
> be possible, on Sky there are three multiplexes dedicated to ITV feeds
> so there is quite a lot to be potentially saved. The switching your
> talking about is half the issue, its also the fact that you can only
> really cut from one stream to another roughly once every 12 frames due
> to the nature of MPEG, hence why set-top boxes stop for a sec when you
> change channel. This gives you a very tight window if you want to do a
> seamless switch and would also be dependent on the set-top boxes
> ability to traverse the SI table in that time.



The details of the satellite multiplexes can be seen here:

http://www.lyngsat.com/astra2d.html

I agree that it might take a bit of tweaking to get a perfect frame join as
you switch into the national feed and then split out to the regional feed.

I can't see why it's not been done before.  It would be very handy if the
main channel was, say in MPEG-4 HD quality and then the regional opt-outs
were in MPEG-2, even if you had to carry an MPEG-2 version for "old boxes".
I dunno how well all the decoders would cope though, without an
old-fashioned "black frame".

But it could be done on analogue - you could never see the join in the
switch to regional programmes on the BBC even back as far as "Sixty
Minutes", so it MUST be possible.

If the MPEG-2 streams collapse, the "opportunistic data" on the interactive
systems could claim all the spare bandwidth automatically....




Perhaps it is possible, I haven't seen anything from BBC R&D about it
> (but then again the BBC management is reportedly flushing that away
> like everything else of worth from the old corporation) and it would
> be interesting to try it, assuming I can't find any reason not to, I
> will try to scavenge enough equipment/rack space to run a little test
> at some stage.



It would save a fortune on transmission, but only if you could realistically
use the space.  ITV wishes to collapse it's regions anyway, and the only
gain could be interactive services for ITV.

I guess the BBC could use the spare space for either PROPER high definition
versions of all the BBC channels, which would be nice.


-
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial
> list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>



-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv

Reply via email to