On 21/11/2007, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2007, Martin Belam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is kind of the figures I was expecting. Just to be clear here,
> > the way I see it is that if the BBC stands up and says we believe in
> > "libre" not "gratis", so we don't want anything to do with  software
> > or codecs that involve patents, pretty much at least 80%+ of the
> > people who own portable music players in the UK are going to turn
> > around and say "Chuffing hell, lads, why doesn't that work on my
> > machine? I mean, I *paid* for all this stuff to be made by the BBC.
> > Who are you to tell me which machines I should have to buy".
>
> I'm not suggesting that the BBC have the moral courage to take a stand
> on this issue like that; merely that they should not contribute to the
> problem by only using proprietary or patent-encumbered formats.
>
> > I mean, isn't that the argument for the BBC making the iPlayer work in
> > Linux - because a market is there and so the BBC should support it in
> > the interest of universal access?
>
> Universal access is the ideal, but the iPlayer attacks that ideal
> because it is proprietary and DRM. So if the BBC makes the current
> iPlayer work in GNU/Linux in the interest of universal access, that
> will be tragic. Promoting proprietary software and inflicting DRM on
> people is unethical.
>
> If the BBC doesn't make its iPlayer work on GNU/Linux, but just makes
> it with DRMless patentless media formats (like the one invented at the
> BBC, perhaps?) and documents its protocols, that would be enough -
> because the free software community would write a (probably
> crossplatform) iPlayer-like program from that, itself, without needing
> any license-fee money spent.
>
> > Or, they could just make 120+ radio programmes available free to
> > download, for nothing, for people to keep for as long as they like,
> > and re-encode into any format they want....
>
> Reencoding them with.... patent encumbered software. Mmm.


And, more the point, you will get all the anti aliasing artifacts if you
don't encode from the original PCM WAV..


--
> Regards,
> Dave
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial
> list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>



-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
http://www.ukfree.tv

Reply via email to