Hardware manufacturers are notorious for preferring open MPEG, SMPTE,
ITU standards over proprietary codecs (other than their own). I saw a
presentation at SATIS in Paris a few years ago which listed the main
PC codecs (including Theora) and then called MPEG "the only standards
that matter". This argument still holds up: out of the three
historical players who have been battling these past 15 years or so,
the only reliable format across players all this time was and is...
MPEG-1. From 1992!

I'm not sure "most people who think of Dirac" number more than a
handful though. In the absence of any press communication, this is one
of those quiet events which could have enormous impact.

Sean



On Jan 24, 2008 11:39 PM, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean DALY wrote:
> > I think this is fabulous news. Congratulations to all who worked on it.
> >
> > A patent-unencumbered (say that 10x fast) royalty-free codec is
> > something the world needs.
> >
> > So what if Microsoft doesn't support it, they don't support H.264 or
> > AAC either (XBox & Zune aside) and look where that got iTunes.
>
> It is indeed fabulous news, but people should bear in mind that Dirac
> Pro / VC2 is not the codec that most people think of as "Dirac".  It
> lacks motion-compensation, which is unnecessary for its intended use,
> but which is needed to make it competitive with widely-adopted
> alternatives such as WM9 and h.264.
>
> Dirac Pro is being marketed in hardware form as a way of squeezing HD
> video down relatively low-bandwidth cables, such as the SDI cables
> installed in many TV studios for standard definition signals - see
> http://www.numediatechnology.com/products.html for details.
>
> http://dirac.sourceforge.net/specification.html gives more details,
> including the specifications of the two codecs.
>
> S
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial list archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to