vijay chopra wrote:
The BBC response article is only marginally better, again referring to "hackers" for no apparent reason though they at least have a motive to mislead: propaganda. Though I probably shouldn't attribute to malice what's adequately explained by stupidity.
Personally, I can think of explanations that don't insult the journalist in question. :-) That aside though, the BBC News website has a form for people to report factual errors which you could use if you felt sufficiently strongly about the matter.
S - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
