James Cridland wrote:
Quite an interesting piece at
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/21/lse_music_debate/
I mean, yes, it's from The Register, which probably means it's mostly
bollocks, but I couldn't help read this piece and think back to a few
years ago when I was presenting about podcasting (on behalf of a
commercial broadcaster) and was roundly mobbed by the audience for
daring to wish to make a commercial business from podcasting.
via http://memex.naughtons.org/archives/2008/03/24/4949
interesting, its a pity that Andrew Orlowski couldn't have written up a
unbiased version of the events, and then blogged about it or something.
I don't think the best way of saying you think and event is biased is to
write an openly one sided article repeatedly abusing it.
Shame.
Still, sounded quite interesting
Audience participation (when it's not wanted) always makes things more fun!
--
www.blog.tdobson.net
----
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us
still has one object.
If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now
has two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
