Christopher Woods wrote:
Personally I'd rather have naff analogue with continuous audio where I can
gist the few words I miss, rather than have a lossy (moreso than analogue,
arguably) digital signal with squelchy audio and dropouts every so often. I
put up with it on my PC's freeview receiver, but I still find myself
wandering into the kitchen to tune in on the analogue set.
I think I'm a bit strange.
IIRC subjective quality tests have shown that poor quality audio causes
a reduction in reported *video* quality of one point on the CCIR 5-point
subjective quality scale. I can probably dig out a reference if
anyone's sufficiently interested. Which suggests that people in general
are even weirder than you think that you are, if that's any comfort. :-)
S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
