2008/6/13 Fred Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Thu Jun 12 19:45:49 2008, Brian Butterworth wrote:
> > 2008/6/12 Fred Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Thu Jun 12 07:35:20 2008, Brian Butterworth wrote:
> > > > 2008/6/12 Dogsbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > What strange install allows RealPlaer but not Flash?
> > >
> > > Er, free software ones.
> >
> >
> > http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/alternates/
> >
> > has
> >
> > Linux x86, Solaris, Pocket PC and HP-UX versions as well as Windows
> > 98/ME/2000/XP/Vista and MacOS/X
>
> So? They still aren't free.


They don't cost anything at all to the consumer.  That's "free" is the
prtacicable sense.  RealPlayer is, if you mean free-software, is much less
free.

Anyway, Flash is now "free" in the sense you mean, isn't it?




-- 

Brian Butterworth

http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice,
since 2002

Reply via email to