2008/6/13 Fred Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu Jun 12 19:45:49 2008, Brian Butterworth wrote: > > 2008/6/12 Fred Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Thu Jun 12 07:35:20 2008, Brian Butterworth wrote: > > > > 2008/6/12 Dogsbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > What strange install allows RealPlaer but not Flash? > > > > > > Er, free software ones. > > > > > > http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/alternates/ > > > > has > > > > Linux x86, Solaris, Pocket PC and HP-UX versions as well as Windows > > 98/ME/2000/XP/Vista and MacOS/X > > So? They still aren't free.
They don't cost anything at all to the consumer. That's "free" is the prtacicable sense. RealPlayer is, if you mean free-software, is much less free. Anyway, Flash is now "free" in the sense you mean, isn't it? -- Brian Butterworth http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice, since 2002