I just stumbled across this article that explains what may have actually
happened,
When Algorithms Attack: How Googlebot And Tribune (And Some Idiot) Killed
United Airlines
Stock<http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/when-algorithms-attack-how-googlebot-and-tribune-and-some-idiot-killed-united-air-lines-stock>



On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Sam Mbale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "the hard part is getting the people who write the
> requirements to understand why they should care...."
> I would like to think they care, it may just be the case of being caught
> off guard.
> I have search marketing experience and I know that these vulnerabilities
> can be exploited
> if you can ignore ethics. Even though Google does not condone googlebombing
> the practice is still
> widespread. You may recall the case of the Daily Mail columnist Julie
> Moult <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/28/julie_moult_googlebomb/> .
> If you Google Julie Moult a site very critical of her is still NO.1. This
> is not exactly Googlebombing,
>  but shows how search results can be influenced by individuals.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2008/9/11 Christopher Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> I'm currently trying to ensure that my current client
>> >> builds suitable safeguards into a similar feature they're
>> >> proposing to deliver.
>> >
>> >
>> > Well surely it can't take much; something like SELECT * FROM
>> > 'active_news_articles' where 'published_date' => date(today)-90days?
>> >
>> >
>> > (I know that's a horrible mangling of SQL syntax, but you get the idea
>> :P )
>> > As far as safeguards go, it can't be that much more difficult at the
>> > simplest level to filter out the old stories. Nobody cares whether a
>> really
>> > old story is popular or not... because it's old. ;)
>>
>> I'm sure the technical implementation will end up looking very much
>> like that. The hard part is getting the people who write the
>> requirements to understand why they should care....
>>
>> Peter
>> --
>> Peter Bowyer
>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee
>> -
>> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
>> please visit
>> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
>>  Unofficial list archive:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sam Mbale
> Mpelembe Network
> http://www.mpelembe.net
>
> Follow me on http://twitter.com/mpelembe
>
>


-- 
Sam Mbale
Mpelembe Network
http://www.mpelembe.net

Follow me on http://twitter.com/mpelembe

Reply via email to