I'm a little unsure if being a member of a political party is a private or public matter, in fact.
2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And it was published, by an ex-member of the BNP. (Obviously despite > a high court injunction, but when it comes to little things like, say, > "the law", you don't think it applies to you when copying stuff, do > you?) > > So where's your problem? It's published, it's in the public domain. > > Rich. > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> That surprises me Dave. After all, you're always bleating on about > >> how just because information can be copied, it should be copied, and > >> how there's no such thing, morally, as copyright any more, and how all > >> information should be free. > > > > Unpublished information is clearly different to published information. > > - > > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, > please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > -- Brian Butterworth
