That sounds great- it's been troubling me for a while that the shift into rich web apps seems to have been tied to a couple of proprietary platforms. But forgive my utter ignorance, but since there is a layer of Google Web Kit underpinning this, doesn't that make it's "openess" a bit less "open"?
Edit: oops just read the docs- It's under the Apache 2.0 open source license- pretty open then! huzzah! a On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This is neat: > > http://www.advogato.org/article/981.html > > Cheers, > Dave > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ > -- Ant Miller tel: 07709 265961 email: ant.mil...@gmail.com - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
