As the banner graphic on Wave points out: its a "preview" - in my
understanding that means it is not even something they'd consider calling
a beta.
My gut feeling is that performance issues are as likely to be down to the
client implementation as the servers - I think I'm noticing gradually
worse slowdown the longer I use a session in a tab. Also look at your CPU
usage when, for example, you use the history "playback" function, or open
a particularly complex or long lived Wave.
Matt
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:15:59 -0000, Ian Forrester
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
I was at Social Media Café Manchester yesterday and there was a session
about Wave. I and Paul Robertson stated the fact that the "wave" people
are there seeing isn't wave at all. Its simply a rough cut
implementation of what's possible with the wave protocol.
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=&ands=wave&phrase=&ors=¬s=&tag=smc_mcr&lang=all&from=&to=&ref=&near=&within=15&units=mi&since=2009-11-30&until=2009-12-02&rpp=15
So during the rest of the discussion and reading this -
http://orchard.co.uk/Blog/Google-Wave-much-maligned-but-missunderstood-128.aspx,
I'm wondered if Google had put out wave too early for consumers?
What do others think?
Secret[] Private[] Public[x]
Ian Forrester
Senior Backstage Producer
BBC R&D North Lab,
1st Floor Office, OB Base,
New Broadcasting House, Oxford Road,
Manchester, M60 1SJ
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--
| Matt Hammond
| Research Engineer, FM&T, BBC, Kingswood Warren, Tadworth, Surrey, UK
| http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
