Mo McRoberts <[email protected]> wrote at 18:15 on 2010-01-22: > > There’s also a secondary concern here, in that the terms under which > the blob is distributed do not just pertain to what you do to the blob > itself, but what you let the user do to both your device (i.e., no > modifications) and to the content which has been received > (HDCP-only-outputs, for example). Not only do both of these have cost > implications, but restrict innovation in the CE space where it relates > to FVHD receivers. > > It is, as they say, a can of worms.
Oh, definitely. I wasn't saying that would be a good implementation, just that it might permit appliance makers to comply without having to reinvent the wheel entirely (which typically leads to square or triangular wheels). S - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
