cubicgaren.com will always be down :)
 
Its cubicgarden.com and its up trust me.

Secret[] Private[x] Public[]

Ian Forrester
Senior Backstage Producer

BBC R&D North Lab,
1st Floor Office, OB Base,
New Broadcasting House, Oxford Road,
Manchester, M60 1SJ 

 


________________________________

        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
        Sent: 28 January 2010 17:47
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [backstage] iPad
        
        
        Ian, 

        I don't know where you host cubicgaren.com (at home, perhaps) but it's 
very often down, as it is now...
        
        
        2010/1/28 Ian Forrester <[email protected]>
        

                I tried calling him but he wouldn't take my call. Something 
about a blog entry I wrote about the ipad?
                 
                :)
                 
                
http://cubicgarden.com/wordpress/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-underwelming-but-not-a-bad-price/

                Secret[] Private[x] Public[]
                
                Ian Forrester
                Senior Backstage Producer
                
                BBC R&D North Lab,
                1st Floor Office, OB Base,
                New Broadcasting House, Oxford Road,
                Manchester, M60 1SJ 

                 


________________________________

                        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brendan Quinn
                        Sent: 28 January 2010 16:15 

                        To: [email protected]
                        
                        Subject: RE: [backstage] iPad
                        
                        
                        heh, we have a "virtual steadicam" system in R&D that 
could address this problem (the motion sickness thing)...
                         
                        has anyone got Steve Jobs' phone number?

________________________________

                        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Kraskin
                        Sent: 28 January 2010 13:49
                        To: [email protected]
                        Subject: Re: [backstage] iPad
                        
                        

                        I'd agree to a gentleman's wager that the second 
generation will have a front facing camera and a native application just for 
this purpose.
                        
                        
                        ----- Original Message -----
                        From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
                        To: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
                        Sent: Thu Jan 28 08:37:23 2010
                        Subject: RE: [backstage] iPad
                        
                        I can see why they didn’t put a camera on it.
                        
                        
                        
                        Who’s going to be bother holding the thing still enough 
to enable decent chat?
                        
                        
                        
                        It would be a nightmare to try and hold it out in front 
of your face and even worse for the person getting motion sickness on the other 
end.
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Kraskin
                        Sent: 28 January 2010 13:28
                        To: [email protected]
                        Subject: Re: [backstage] iPad
                        
                        
                        
                        Re camera, I want it for the exact same reason every 
single apple laptop has one.  Not point and shoot, but video chat.
                        
                        And if developers do change because of this, that's 
great, and perhaps then it will make sense to buy one.
                        
                        
                        ----- Original Message -----
                        From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
                        To: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
                        Sent: Thu Jan 28 07:56:06 2010
                        Subject: Re: [backstage] iPad
                        
                        On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:20, Michael Kraskin 
<[email protected]> wrote:
                        > I think the no-Flash means that it a seriously 
crippled web browser.  Hardly
                        > the "best way to browse the internet," and thus will 
be a serious
                        > disappointment, not only to power users, but to 
casual internet surfers as
                        > well.
                        
                        As a user, the lack of Flash won't affect me much, if 
at all. fewer
                        ads, and that's about it. The kids won't get near it, 
as CBeebies
                        appears to be built almost entirely in Flash (much the 
same with Club
                        Penguin), but I can't say I'd consider them not wanting 
to get their
                        grubby fingers on it a bad thing (though there are 
plenty of games in
                        the App Store they'd like instead).
                        
                        As a web developer, I can't remember the last time web 
developers
                        influenced browsers and not the other way around. Can't 
see that one
                        changing any time soon: if the iPad is successful, 
websites will stop
                        relying on Flash being ubiquitous (either degrading 
where Flash isn't
                        present, or doing something else entirely), assuming 
they and the iPad
                        share customer demographics.
                        
                        > The no-camera thing just screams "wait for the second 
generation before you
                        > buy one"
                        
                        Why on earth would you want a camera on a device whose 
form factor is
                        utterly opposed to the hold-up-point-and-shoot 
facilities in mobile
                        phones which made digital photography mainstream? Not 
saying you're
                        wrong, just that I can't fathom it.
                        
                        M.
                        
                        -
                        Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
unsubscribe, please visit 
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list 
archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
                        
                        This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and 
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless 
specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from 
your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
                        
                        
                        
                        Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or 
received. Further communication will signify your consent to this
                        
                        
                        
                        




        -- 
        
        Brian Butterworth
        
        follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
        web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and 
switchover advice, since 2002
        

Reply via email to