On 6-Apr-2010, at 22:10, Christopher Woods wrote: >>> I'm hoping they'll do the right thing and kill the bill. >> >> Nope - just voted to send it to the committee stage tomorrow. > > The eyes have it, the eyes have it. RT @rhodri: And that was that, folks. > The ayes have it. Chuckling in the chamber. That's democracy, folks. #debill > > And now they all head (back?) off to Strangers for the subsidised pints ;) > > The irony I found with Wishart's apparent stance on this is that he's in a > band, and has been in a few prior to this. Up until now I was under the > impression that he was broadly in favour of doing *something* but that he > took issue with the way certain amendments were almost overreaching their > mandate (if such a thing is possible). I'm now worried he might not be > considering how damaging sections of the Bill could potentially be to > artists and bands who don't have the advantage of prior exposure.
I’m not willing to share my opinion to Wishart in polite company right now. There’s lies, damned lies, statistics, and statistics quoted in parliament. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
