On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 15:49, Nick Reynolds-FM&T <nick.reyno...@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > The BBC had a choice > > a) do nothing and run the risk of content not be available to licence fee > payers > > b) do something which does achieve the desired effect and has a very small > negative impact on a very small group of people if indeed it has any > negative effect at all
with respect, Nick, you've repeatedly demonstrated that you have no technical understanding of the proposal. your choices above are simply factually incorrect, unless 'the desired effect' is something other than that which has been publicly reported. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
