am I missing something?

had assumed this was basic motion detection with parallax?

has no one stripped one down  yet?

best

Jonathan

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/110410-microsoft-kinect-teardown-ifixit.html
(not read...)


On 18 Nov 2010, at 15:22, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:

...all this bumpf about how fancy they are[0] is just a load bollocks.

I am wondering if them Kinect things are really working a lot simpler; and after waking up in the middle of a shower am now postulating that:

1. They have a simple static laser interference pattern (e.g. akin to [1] or those
        star projectors you can buy from street vendors).

2. However this one is very very fine and nicely randomish. i.e. dots less than a few
        mm appart.

3. They use a crappy low resolution normal monochrome web cam; with a black bit of glass so
        only IR gets let through.

4.      They simply pass the image of this camera back.

The reason that this works is that every 'pixel' at CCD level for distances of working range will have 1 to 100 or so 'tiny dots' on it - depending on the distance it is at. Which is why we have roughly the range we get; why we have such a near perfect 1/sigma callibration curve and why the range of values you get it so odd - and why they filter certain types of noise so badly.

And perhaps, perhaps:

5. They do a phase locked loop amplifier loop in software by flashing the projector.

But I doubt that given the noise/error artifacts.

And that is really all there is to it. Anyone here with a good high- res SRL which can do enough IR detection to check if indeed this is the case ? I guess a fun test would be to use a mirror to project a few extra pixels onto a flat area - and see if that area suddenly jumps 'forward'.
        
Thanks,

Dw


0: http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2010/11/features/the-game-changer and all the mystification on how they work.
1:http://www.zimbio.com/Popular+Topics+in+Astronomy/articles/vnjstT2fTM2/Green+30mw+Laser+Pointer+Pen+Style+Star+Holographic
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html . Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to