Dan, > reading this, and the other things you've sent, I wonder if it > would be better to forget about backward compatibility. > given the storage efficiency it's just not a huge burden to start > over. > > Not that I think that should be an explicit *goal*, but it sounds > like this has been a hassle. > > Don't need a bunch of discussion on this, and I'm sure there are > those who disagree with me, but keep it in mind if it gets tough.
I think it's doable to have it be compatible. But you are right - a user could start a new instance with new storage and get a clean set of 4.x backups. The old data could be kept around for a while if needed. Craig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-devel mailing list BackupPC-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
