re to Jeffrey J. Kosowsky <backuppc@ko...> - 2011-03-03 02:53 > I wonder whether here too, it may be best to allow for a configurable > depth to the pool. This would not change the actual pool file names > but just how many levels they are distributed across. > > Then for small installations, one might choose just 2 levels but for > truly humongous installations, it might be better to have 3 or even > more levels. Presumably, different filesystems and hardware would also > influence this tradeoff. > > It would seem that it wouldn't be too hard to modify the code to allow > this to be a user configurable parameter.
Would be a nice to have :) 3 or 4 Levels would make per directory copy operations smaller Greetings Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ BackupPC-devel mailing list BackupPC-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
