On 12/30 10:23 , Michael Mansour wrote: > Personally I'd be trouble-shooting your ext3 problems and working them out, > since ext3 by default offers quite a bit of data resilience.
I use reiserfs for BackupPC data pools (and ext3 for the rest of the OS). Partly because with reiserfs you don't have to worry about running out of inodes. Also, reiserfs is very fast at creating lots of little files, and it resizes nicely. It's nothing special at rewriting or deleting files, and may in fact be slower than ext3 in some ways. (Hans Reiser's claims to the contrary). But it works well enough for the purpose of backuppc's pool; and better than most. I know people who use XFS tho, and report very good success with it. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
