This system doesn't have RAID on it, and yes I am using tar.

I have dir_index enabled, and journaling set to writeback. As well, the 
partition is mounted with noatime.

As for rsync, I haven't tried that yet.

Thank you,
John

David Rees wrote:
> On 3/28/07, John T. Yocum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here is the iostat output, the server is doing two full backups at the
>> moment, along with a nightly. Server specs: P4 3.2Ghz, 512MB RAM, 300GB
>> SATA drive.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# iostat
>> Linux 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp (backup2.fluidhosting.com)    03/28/2007
>>
>> avg-cpu:  %user   %nice    %sys %iowait   %idle
>>             2.98    0.00    0.76   50.02   46.24
>>
>> Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
>> sda              69.48       798.71       428.68 1556126098  835203048
>> sda1              0.00         0.00         0.00       1556        200
>> sda2              0.17         2.68         0.57    5219723    1109536
>> sda3              0.00         0.00         0.00       1073        320
>> sda4              0.00         0.00         0.00          2          0
>> sda5              0.23         3.04         1.14    5914146    2215408
>> sda6            111.33       792.87       426.97 1544752254  831876168
>>
>> On that server, we're seeing backup speeds as low as .11MB/s which are
>> backups of several thousand files. Some backups are over 1MB/s, but
>> those are servers with only 100ish files.
> 
> Was this a raid 5 or raid 1 system with those SATA drives?
> 
> I am concerned about the fact that it's reporting 50% of it's time in
> system instead of near 100% in wait which indicates some other sort of
> bottleneck. If you run iostat with a 5 second interval over a few
> intervals does the avg-cpu look similar?
> 
> Also do you have the dir_index option on? (check by running `tune2fs
> -l /dev/sda6`) Not sure how much of a difference that makes with
> backuppc loads, but that does help significantly with metadata
> operations on large directories.
> 
> It also looks like you are doing tar backups, have you tried rsync backups?
> 
> -Dave
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to