John Pettitt wrote: > Evren Yurtesen wrote: >> >> Perhaps it could be a feature if it checksum checks could be disabled >> altogether >> for situations where the bandwidth is cheap but cpu time is expensive? >> >> Thanks, >> Evren >> >> > That option is called "tar" :-) > > John
Yes, but tar is using only mtime, it doesnt check the file name and directory it sits in, and this causes it to miss some things. Also, would it improve performance cpuwise if we use --whole-file with rsync where large files are transferred? (if bandwidth is not a problem) Wouldnt this also cause uncompression of the backed up file while updating? Thanks, Evren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
