David Rees wrote:
>>> I think that possible workarounds would be to switch to a different
>>> backup transport other than rsync. Can anyone think of any other
>>> solutions?
>> Try carving it up into several chunks that get backed up separately.
>> Make sure your backup server is only trying to back up one host at a time.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, I am only backing up one host at a
> time. I think for now I am going to try to see if I can remove or
> archive some of the files being backed up to reduce the number of
> files in the backup.
>
> I guess the other option would be to upgrade the backup machine from
> 4gb to 8gb. It is running a 64bit Xeon which I suspect may increase
> memory requirements as well compared to a 32bit install.
If you have the bandwidth and don't mind incrementals missing old files
in their new locations under renamed directories, you could switch to tar.
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
