Rob Owens wrote:
> My understanding is that with tar and smb, all files are downloaded (and
> then discarded if they're already in the pool).  Rsync is smart enough,
> though, not to download files already in the pool.
>
> -Rob
>   

I was about to post the same thing.  I moved/renamed some directories 
around on the server I am backing up, and it is downloading the entire 
file(s) again.   Is there any interest in having BackupPC w/ rsync check 
the pool first before downloading?   Is there a reason behind not doing 
it, or is it just something that hasn't been gotten to yet?

Rich

> David Koski wrote:
>   
>> I have been trying to get a good backup with backuppc (2.1.1) but it has been
>> taking days.  I ran a dump on the command line so I could see what is going
>> on and I see the files that are in the pool are being downloaded.  For 
>> example:
>>
>>   pool     700   511/100    80392222 home/daler/My 
>> Documents/DRAWINGS/Lakeport/Pics/C_03.tif
>>
>> This is a large file and at 750kb/s takes a while.  Is this expected?  I 
>> thought if
>> they are in the pool they do not need to be downloaded.
>>
>>     


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to