9:19pm, dan wrote: > betas are betas. if this is a test setup, go ahead and run the beta, but if > this is to hol;d critical data, use the stable. if you are moving to ubuntu > 7.10, then just install ubuntu and `apt-get install backuppc` and you will > be set. > > i will also point out to you that if you will be storing files somewhere > other than the default(ubuntu) /var/lib/backuppc, maybe consider mounting > that volume on /var/lib/backuppc, otherwise some of the status info in the > gui is missing. > Good tip, thanks.
> also, if you want, you can pull bpc3.0 from ubuntu backports instead of > upgrading. i personally just moved a few machines to 7.10 server and im > very happy. > I've upgraded a few machines too, with only a couple minor problems. I enabled backports on that machine, but aptitude is still showing only the old version. Maybe I need to go back and kick it. Paul > On 11/4/07, Paul Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I installed backuppc on a (K)Ubuntu 7.04 machine, not realizing that I was >> getting version 2.1.2. I plan on upgrading the machine to 7.10, and >> upgrading backuppc to 3.0.0. >> Two questions: >> >> 1) Is there anything particular I should worry about or watch out for >> after >> the upgrade? >> >> 2) Should I use the packaged 3.0.0, or is 3.1.0beta1 worth going to? (This >> is for home use--important files (to me) but not a mission critical >> situation or anything.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
