Looks like a good tip. Unfortunately, since I'm running a reiserfs 
filesystem on Linux, it doesn't help me directly. But it does bring up a 
good point: does anyone know of any filesystem tweaks for reiserfs that 
might bring similar improvements in this situation of accessing millions of 
small files?

Paul


Yesterday, John Pettitt wrote:

> I'm posting this to the list so people searching for FreeBSD optimizations 
> will find it in the archives.
> 
> I finally got around to looking at why my FreeBSD server was only backing up 
> at about 2.5MB/sec using tar with clients with lots of
> small files. 
> 
> Using my desktop (a Mac PRO) as the test subject backups were running at 
> about 2.5MB/sec or more accurately 25 files a second.   The
> server (FreeBSD 6.2 with a 1.5 TB UFS2 raid 10 on a 3ware card) was disk 
> bound.
> 
> Running the ssh / tar combo from the command line directed to /dev/null gave 
> close to 25MB/sec confirming that it wasn't the client or
> the network.  I've done the normal optimization stuff (soft updates, 
> noatime).   After a lot of digging I discovered
> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem
> 
> The ufs filesystem hashes directories to speed up access when there are lots 
> of files in a directory (as happens with the pool)
> however the maximum memory allocated to the hash by default is 2 MB!     This 
> is way too small and the hash buffers were thrashing on
> almost every pool file open.
> 
> (for those who care sysctl -a | egrep dirhash will show the min, max and 
> current hash usage - if current is equal to max you've
> probably got it set too small)
> 
> On my box setting the vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem to 128M using sysctl did the 
> trick - the system is using 72M for the whole pool tree (2.5
> million files) and backups are now running at about 10 MB/sec and 100 files a 
> second! (this is now compute bound on the server which
> is an old P4 2.6 box).
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
  "I've started referring to the action against Iraq as
  Desert Storm 1.1, since it reminds me of a Microsoft upgrade:
  it's expensive, most people aren't sure they want it, and it
  probably won't work." -- Kevin G. Barkes
----------------------------------------------------------------

-----10942 days until retirement!-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to