Craig Barratt wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to do incremental forever with BackupPc like you
>> can do with TSM, or if it is not possible, do you plan to implement it
>> in the future ?
>>
>> I understand it can/will be cpu intensive, but such a feature would be
>> nice with some servers.
>>
>> Thanks for a great product.
>
> A fundamental change to the manner in which backups are stored is
> planned for 4.x, and that will allow rsync "incremental forever" if
> you choose (assuming you find the risk acceptable that the contents
> of the files are not actually ever being checked).
Could you add a way to constrain the --ignore-timestamp option to
certain time windows (like weekends only), or a certain multiple of
runs, or to leave it off on the scheduled runs but permit it to be
explicitly forced when manually starting a full?
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
