R.Quenett wrote:
> 
> One of the specifics I need to learn a lot more about is the verification 
> of the data I am backing up.  Do existing versions of backuppc make it 
> possible for a user to attack this area from within backuppc itself? 

This is the point of 'full' runs in backuppc.  With tar and smb 
transports, completely new copies are made, which will be linked to the 
old ones only if the contents still match, and with rsync, a full 
block-checksum comparsion is done.

 > Is
> anyone using an approach involving, say, md5sum that they would be 
> willing to share?

If you are looking for an ad-hoc end-to-end check, try doing a restore 
to some alternate location, then (being very careful you understand what 
you are doing...) run rsync with the -nv options against the original 
target and your restored copy.  The -n tells rsync to go through the 
motions but not actually copy anything (and is somewhat critical if you 
typed your command backwards).  The -v option will display the filenames 
that would have been acted on without the -n.   The result of this 
exercise should be only the list of files that have changed on the 
target since the backup run.


-- 
   Les Mikesell
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to