On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:23:56AM +0200, Holger Parplies wrote: > I keep repeating this, so you might all be bored, but still:
[...] > When you factor pooling into the equasion, this means that the difference > between rsync full and incremental backups is smaller than for tar/smb > backups, which is yet far smaller than for tape backups for instance. Or, the > other way around, for tape backups the difference is obvious, for tar/smb you > can still see it clearly, while for rsync backups you have to look through a > microscope. But it's still the same difference, and it's still there. I like that explanation! :-) IMHO it should go to the Wiki. Tino. -- "What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht." www.craniosacralzentrum.de www.forteego.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
