Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > I would be *very* interested in hearing your (informal) roadmap of > where you would like to take BackupPC (and where you wouldn't). > > As I have mentioned before, there is an almost endless amount of > extensions that could be added ranging from very modest tweaks to > whole new directions that would fundamentally transform BackupPC. It > would be good to hear your views and to have an active discussion > among users about what is the right balance of extensions and new > functionality.
Maybe the mailinglist for development discussions might be of interest to you? See https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel > Well, I think you have answered your own question in part. FUSE is and > has been standard on current kernels for probably 2 years now. So, any > recent distro will certainly have it included and I imagine by the > time 4.x is released that even "older" distros like CentOS and RHEL > will have it ;) Enterprise distributions are usually not too keen on adding new functionality to a release. I'm not sure if for instance Red Hat is planning on adding FUSE support to RHEL 4. Nils Breunese. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
