Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 10:16:05 +0300 on Wednesday, April 8, 2009: > > Actually it should be possible to use any protocol. However, because of > > a bug that only now is being fixed, Windows clients with SSH server and > > rsync have not been possible. > >>From my experimentation, the issue seems to be associated with the > rsync protocol used which now downgrades to protocol 28 (if I recall > correctly). The problem doesn't occur with protocol 30 but backuppc > won't be able to use protocol 30 unless and until perl-File-RsyncP is > updated. > > Are you saying that there is another way to "fix" the problem that is > currently in the works or are you assuming that perl-File-RsyncP is > being updated? >
Referring to Craig Barratt's mail on this list maybe a week or two ago, yes. And no, I have not seen any other fix. He and others have been experimenting with either using FUSE to get around this, or updating to version 30. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
