Richard Hansen wrote:
>>> The clients have 4 to 6
>>> million (largely redundant) files each.
>> Using tar as the xfer method would avoid the issue with the tradeoff
>> that you use more bandwidth for full runs and don't reflect changes
>> quite as accurately in increments.
>
> I've switched to tar for now, and I'm hoping that it will prove to be an
> adequate solution.
It's kind of off-topic here, but maybe there's a better way to deal with
the files you said were largely redundant - perhaps subversion or some
other revision control system would work better than storing so many
copies as individual files.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
