Jim Leonard wrote:
> (since the box is an older machine with only a single processor, CPU 
> usage is my main worry as File::RsyncP is not as efficient as binary rsync).

Actually, since backuppc_dump does a lot more than just emulate rsync, 
this was not a fair statement.

However, it is a fair statement to complain that backuppc_dump is not 
multi-threaded, which would really help on multi-CPU systems (the copy 
could be one thread, the comparison another, the compression a third, 
etc.).  Hopefully that's on the development roadmap?
-- 
Jim Leonard (trix...@oldskool.org)            http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:           http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at     http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to