Jon Craig wrote: > Lastly, we wouldn't be having a discusion about replicating the > backuppc server if backuppc wasn't as stable and robust as it is. > BackupPC must first and foremost be a reliable and trustworthy > repository of backup data. It having the ability to replicate itself > for "DR" purposes comes second. > > > Perhaps - but a very close second. Backuppc is very stable and robust. But, disasters do happen. I have had my grits saved at least twice by having a remote backup of the backup server (remember Katrina and New Orleans?) and I am very nervous about using a backup technology that cannot be replicated properly without physical access.
Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
