On 12/03 07:11 , Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > For a slight bit of incremental security, I do: > ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender * > > which I believe restricts to read only (but it's not well > documented).
Fair enough. It's not something I've tested thoroughly. I think I might have tried it once a very long time ago, but wasn't successful... it's too far gone from memory. In any case, I don't set up backuppc to allow direct restores; so if this does work now, it might be good to adopt. > Current version is at least 30 though perl-File-RsyncP only supports > up to protocol 28. Still, having a 3.0+ version is beneficial in terms > of more efficient memory usage. Also, version 3.0 is helpful on > Windows to avoid various rsync errors. I don't think rsync 3.0 final release was out when I wrote that document. :) -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
