On 1/27/2010 10:04 AM, John Hudak wrote:
>
> Pet peve: One issue that I have found quite annoying is that the
> Debian/Ubuntu branches have their own structure of where to put
> applications and utilities in the file structure. I came from a Bell
> Labs/ATT/BDS UNIX background and have used Slackware extensively in the
> past. For me, that was the 'standard' and routing around the guts of
> Debian and finding out (and still learning) were system files,
> application files etc are located has been a little frustrating.
Most linux distros make some attempt to follow the LSB/FHS standards
(basically some committee shuffling things around without quite enough
thought to make 3rd party packages portable).
> So was
> the concept of sudo in Ubuntu (Why is there no easily identifiable root
> state (e.g. root terminal)...At least Debian will launch a root terminal
> ....So, I guess it just depends what one is accustom to......
You can 'sudo su -' to get a root terminal if you want. That even works
on a Mac, which they seem to want to emulate.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
