Hi,
----- "Norbert Schulze" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Tino,
>
> > Your I/O system seems saturated (70-80% of time is spent waiting for
> > I/O). Try running only one BackupPC_nightly in parallel.
>
> Yesterday i set $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = 2; to
> $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = 1;
>
> Currently still running :-/
> admin 4/8 01:00 BackupPC_nightly -m 0 255 11896
>
> Current vmstat 10 10 output:
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
> r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
> 0 2 18012 7261024 688028 95976 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 1 78 18
> 0 2 18012 7263008 687052 94848 0 0 5634 1 483 201 0 0 68 31
> 0 2 18012 7267968 687212 90248 0 0 5431 3 505 208 0 0 68 31
> 0 2 18012 7267604 687876 89996 0 0 5697 0 496 196 0 0 69 31
> 0 2 18012 7268348 687092 89884 0 0 6065 4 521 202 0 0 68 32
> 0 2 18012 7268100 687616 89684 0 0 5555 2 487 200 0 0 68 31
> 0 2 18012 7268224 687548 89648 0 0 5571 0 492 208 0 0 69 30
> 0 2 18012 7267852 688032 89712 0 0 5564 1 483 198 0 0 70 30
> 0 2 18012 7267976 687484 89480 0 0 5768 3 490 197 0 0 69 31
> 0 2 18012 7268472 686848 89716 0 0 5362 2 510 211 0 0 67 32
>
Is this running in a VM? I often see high CPU wait times when doing disk I/O in
a VM.
Gerald
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
