On Thu, 6 May 2010 08:51:12 -0700, Kris Lou <k...@themusiclink.net> wrote:
> Hey people,
> I'm wondering what the preferred method is to backing up Windows
clients,
> especially in terms of performance. Currently, I'm simply mounting
> windows drives via SMB/autofs, and running rsync over that. I like it
> because I don't have to install any additional software on the clients.
> But I know/read that a lot of people run Cygwin and rsync directly.
> What are the advantages of that?
> Thanks,
I find it works better than smbfs as it pretty much bypasses permissions
(if I run the rsyncd as a local service) and then I just have to deal with
(much simpler) rsyncd access control (allowed hosts, secrets, etc.).
Your mileage may vary but moving my 1 client from smb to rsyncd solved all
my 'access denied' problems (after a good deal of attempting to fix the smb
access).
-Josh
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Joshua Malone Systems Administrator
(jmal...@nrao.edu) NRAO Charlottesville
434-296-0263 www.cv.nrao.edu
434-249-5699 (mobile)
BOFH excuse #360:
Your parity check is overdrawn and you're out of cache.
--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
