I'm also assuming this means it'll be harder to access the data outside of BackupPC itself as well.
Craig Barratt wrote: > Trey writes: > > > > I should probably look back at the archives for this, but "no > > hardlinks"? I thought that was the way the pool was able to save disk > > space -- an essential feature (at least for us). Is this going to be > > implemented in some other way? > > > > Yes, pooling continues to work. Reference counting is done at the > application level (using a simple data base) rather than file system > level (using hardlinks). This will make the BackupPC data store a > lot easier to copy and backup. > > Craig > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [email protected] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [email protected]. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
