I have been running backuppc on Debian sid for over five years without a
problem. I don't upgrade it daily, mainly when a high-priority/security
related fix is released or when backuppc is upgraded.
IMHO, unstable tends to be more stable than testing. It also tends to be a
rolling release, which is one reason I run sid in the first place.
--b
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:02 AM, G.W. Haywood <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I'm on the digest list and they come through
> (a) infrequently and (b) over one hundred messages per digest... :|
>
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 Boniforti Flavio wrote:
>
> > Now I'm still a bit confused: would using "Debian Sid" be too risky for
> > breaking up things?
>
> You want to use an unstable distribution for your backups?
>
> Forgive me for saying so, but I think that would be insane.
>
> --
>
> 73,
> Ged.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Automate Storage Tiering Simply
> Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful,
> automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how
> you can reduce costs and improve performance.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Automate Storage Tiering Simply
Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful,
automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how
you can reduce costs and improve performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
