also sprach Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chr...@real-time.com> [2010.11.03.2020 +0100]: > Run full backups on all hosts, then BackupPC_nightly?
also sprach Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> [2010.11.03.2022 +0100]: > I'd run new full backups as soon as practical. That will at least > fix up anything missing in the latest run which is usually the > most important. Yeah, that's surely a good idea. I was wondering mostly about cleanup actually. I assume BackupPC_nightly removes everything from the pool with a link count == 1. Hence, the worst that could happen is that all previous backups would be rendered invalid, no? Thanks guys, -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- benjamin franklin spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve Improved Network Security with IP and DNS Reputation. Defend against bad network traffic, including botnets, malware, phishing sites, and compromised hosts - saving your company time, money, and embarrassment. Learn More! http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpdev2dev-nov
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
