Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 2011-09-07 17:46:47 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups very slow after upgrade to squeeze]: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, James L. Evans <j...@techatl.com> wrote: > > > > xvda1 10GB Operating system (24% used) > > xvdb1 536MB Swap partition > > xvbc1 214GB backup storage (72% used) > > > > I'm not sure how to tell what a "fragmented VM image" would look like. > > Did the location or allocation change as part of the upgrade? If the > partitions are mapped straight from the host, I wouldn't expect them > to, but something seems to have made writing very slow. Or perhaps > you have concurrent activity on a different VM or application that > competes with the physical disk head location.
you did see the kjournald oops? I don't really know what to make of it, but there is some kind of basic problem (hardware, on-disc corruption, software incompatibility, ...). I'd look into that first, whether or not it is directly related to the preformance issue. Regards, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
