> -----Original Message----- > From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:19 PM > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] (somewhat solved) Backing up many small > files > > > This indicates that I was wrong; directory/inode traversal is not the > > issue. It's speedy enough to run the test. It is likely in the rsync block > > checksum comparison after all. > > How does this time compare to an incremental where few/no files > actually change? You should only do the checksum comparison on fulls > or files where the directory timestamp/length differ on incrementals. > If there is an extreme difference, maybe you are out of available > RAM and pushing the server or target into swap with the size of the > directory contents.
"A lot faster". So can I disable checksumming and still use rsync, or is it tar I want? -- /Sorin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
